Chicago, Illinois – Barack Obama continued following the Communist plan of destroying the dollar as he introduced a monumental spending plan in the wake of the American financial crisis.
Following the Cloward-Piven strategy of induced bankruptcy and social unrest, Obama proposed the largest spending program in decades, sparking uproar and controversy from critics who said the proposal would destroy the U.S. currency.
Prominent financial analysts and historians alike denounced the plan, with some calling it outright dangerous.
“We’re 11 trillion dollars in debt, and now we’ve got somebody saying, spend more?”, one financial specialist at a New York-based firm said. “Any economics major can tell you that’s a boneheaded move.”
To many, the plan was no surprise as Obama was simply following orders. Many viewed Obama’s actions as a dutiful agent following his organization’s plans – the objective of world communism and one world order. Through their eyes, debauching the currency, increasing the national debt and exacerbating the current financial crisis were all lead objectives for the Communist leadership.
“It was perhaps in this sense that the plan was utterly predictable – the communists must first destroy America before they can bring about their radical revolution of the country,” one prominent anti-communist activist and patriot said. “Debauchery of the currency is a must to accomplish this goal.”
Anti-Communist analysts said the Communists wish to use Obama’s power to cause hyperinflation of the currency much like happened to the Weimar Republic, Argentina, and Rome. By introducing billions of dollars more into the money supply, inflation would skyrocket, causing the dollar to lose value and purchasing power.
The Cloward-Piven strategy calls for bankruptcy of the nation first, social unrest and rioting second, and massive communist restructuring of the nation third. By loading the nation with unrealistic entitlement programs, increasing debt obligations, and lowering tax receipts by hiking taxes, the Communists are doing everything in their power to achieve the first goal.
According to the strategy, once bankruptcy is accomplished, they would then stoke the fears of the people, setting races against each other, and inciting riots and violence. The Communists would then emerge from the fray, promising a ‘solution’ to the problem they created.
On Capitol Hill, many feared the changes that would occur if Obama took office. While the Democrats do not have a filibuster-proof majority, they would only need 4 or 5 senators to pass legislation. Many congressional historians see the first two years as crucial to the Communist’s plans.
“Obama’s only going to have this many Democratic Senators for 2 years,” one Capitol Hill insider confided privately. “Their feet are against the fire – they know they’ve got a limited amount of time to implement their radical agenda.”
American patriots and freedom-loving Senators vowed to fight the Communists every step of the way. “Battle plans are already being drawn up,” one top-level adviser warned. “Obama is in for the fight of his life.”
The hopes and dreams of the American public rested on a slim minority in the Senate and House. The fragile 200-year democracy that the Founders built teetered on dangerous ground, and many Americans viewed the future with stern vigilance.
“This is America, and it’s always going to be America,” Robert Wilson, an auto plant worker in Michigan said. “We don’t care what they try. We’ll destroy them if they try to take Americans’ freedom.”
The sentiment was shared across the nation. There was a spirit of defiance and patriotism spreading through the land, from Boston to Pittsburgh, from Texas to Fargo. Many remembered the history and past of the United States, and vowed to fight for it’s tenets. From shore to shore, there was a unity of spirit not seen since the days of 9/11.
Constitutional experts warned of a political backlash if Obama followed the Communist orders.
“He’s built up precious political capital, but if he goes this route he runs a very high risk of losing it all,” one Washington insider said on condition of anonymity. “History will tell if he is viewed as a benevolent leader or a dictatorial tyrant.”