COMMUNISTS ATTEMPT UNPRECEDENTED POWER GRAB

THE INSANITY OF THE COMMUNISTS

Washington, DC – Communists attempted a power grab unprecedented in American history, according to observers, increasing the possibility of a coup by the American people.

One of the Communist leaders, Barney Frank, proposed legislation that would monitor and control the salaries of all companies who received government loans. The draconian measures would control the pay of all employees of companies who had received financial loans from the government.

Economic analysts viewed the move with alarm, criticizing the Communists for blatant violation of Constitution. Polls showed widespread resistance to the repressive proposal, placing the Marxists on the defensive for what appeared to many as an aggressive power grab.

“They really crossed the line this time,” one financial analyst said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “The public’s anger is palpable.”

The Communists have been attempting to bankrupt the nation in adherence to the Cloward-Piven strategy, while simultaneously trying to sabotage the capitalist market system. In firm control of Congress for the past two and a half years, they have passed egregious spending bills designed to overload the system and prompt defaults on debt obligations.

Many in the Party view this moment in history as an unprecedented opportunity to wreak the destruction on the capitalist system they have been longing for. In decades past, never have they achieved Communist majorities in both houses while simultaneously possessing the White House. Political analysts marked the accomplishment to slick marketing, deceitful messaging and an intricate network of anonymous smear organizations.

“The Communists have never represented themselves for who they actually are,” one political insider remarked. “If they did, they wouldn’t stand a chance. So they have to resort to these tactics. They don’t really have a choice.”

Now that they are in power, the Communists have been attempting a radical overhaul of the nation’s most esteemed institutions, such as the free market, limited government and Constitutional rights such as gun ownership and freedom of speech. Many characterize the strategy as a duplicitous ‘coup’.

“Bezmenov warned of how the Soviets of old wanted this,” a prominent anti-Communist confided. “This was the end-goal of the Russian Communists, and what they devoted 85% of their resources to. They wanted America to become a bankrupt, repressive nation so that they could violently overthrow it. And they’re getting closer each day.”

Yuri Bezmenov, a high-ranking defector who escaped from the KGB and sought refuge in the United States, warned Americans that the war had never ended and that the Soviets were continuing their plans for America’s destruction. According to Bezmenov, they were intending to accomplish this through extreme indoctrination of the American public over decades, slowly transforming the next generation into a veritable cadre of ‘useful idiots’.

The Sword Of Truth’s historical research confirms this analysis. America has undergone profound transformation in the past 50 years, from liberalization of narcotic use to sexual promiscuity to the destruction of cultural norms. The hand of the Soviets is quite clear behind the scenes, manipulating the minds of the naive American citizens into believing they live in a peaceful globe, with no powerful enemies and a few weak ones.

Many say the United States has indeed become a nation of useful idiots, ripe for the plucking. The Russian-created spectre of ‘terrorism’ has accomplished its’ goal; to create a diversion, exhaust U.S. military might, and create plausible deniability when the Russians do finally attack with a nuclear or biological weapon.

Respected anti-Communists warned that first massive economic destruction had to occur. “The Communists want internal strife, civil unrest and riots,” one of the most famed anti-Communist activists explained on condition of anonymity. “Once America is consumed with its internal problems, then the attack comes.”

COMMUNISTS INSTIGATE VIOLENT PROTESTS ACROSS THE GLOBE

COMMUNISTS GIN UP MOBS INTO ‘WILD CRAZES’

London, England – Communist groups have been ramping up attack campaigns ahead of a schedule G-20 summit of the world’s leading economic powers. Funded by billionaire benefactors, they have been manipulating crowds into what some have described as a ‘mob-like’ effect, preying on the populace’s general discontent with unemployment and anemic economic growth.

“They’re gonna get someone hurt,” a political analyst based out of London said. “If they continue to scapegoat the bankers like this, they’ll have blood on their hands.”

The discussion has been dominated by these loud voices – communists who have continued to exploit the financial crisis to call for overthrows of capitalist society and Western structure. Many hope that they will not succeed in their plans to sabotage capitalism and blame it on financial specialists. So far, hope is bleak.

“They’ve had tremendous success so far,” one financial analyst speaking on condition of anonymity said. He feared for his life after communist thugs vandalized his house and intimidated his family. “I think the communists themselves can’t believe how smoothly their plans are going”.

The communists continued their demonization of the bankers, escalating the rhetoric and goading others into violence. Some outright called for violence and murder against the ones who ’caused this’.

Prominent watchdog organizations have condemned the communist strategy. “It’s sickening, what they’re doing” Robert Walsh, director of ASP, the Association for Security and Prosperity noted. “They should all be thrown in jail and prosecuted because their criminal actions are causing major instability.”

The Communists have historically exploited the democratic system with a constant eye on eventual subversion and domination. Yuri Bezmenov was one of the most prominent defectors to blow the whistle on the Russian Communists plans for world domination. Bezmenov, speaking in a multipart interview, revealed the Soviet tactic known as ‘ideological subversion’ which he said drew 80% of the communists resources. According to Bezmenov, ideological subversion was nothing more than a form of brainwashing – with its goal being to get the American people to accept communist ideas and communist concepts.

Fast-forward 50 years, and we can see the effects. Government has crept forward with every year, swallowing up more and more liberties. The Communists have allied themselves together militarily and are poised to attack now that America is on its financial knees. Staging demonstrations and manufacturing hatred towards bankers is simply another tactic. We must fight them every step of the way.

COMMUNISTS CONTINUE ATTEMPTS TO BANKRUPT UNITED STATES

CLOWARD-PIVEN STRATEGY FOLLOWED IN QUEST FOR MARXIST REVOLUTION

Washington, DC – Communist Barney Frank and other prominent members of the Democrat Party continued their strategy of induced bankruptcy by calling for increased government spending under pretense of ’saving’ the auto industry.

The strategy, an aspect of the Cloward-Piven tactic, calls for putting such a financial strain on the government’s balance sheet that the government collapses. The authors of the strategy reasoned that this national bankruptcy could be stoked to produce civil unrest, under which a drastic socialization of the country could be implemented.

Frank’s actions were but one aspect of this multifaceted strategy, as he used the guise of saving the auto economy to spend yet more taxpayer dollars, pushing the country closer to hyperinflation and higher debt obligations.

In a somewhat hysterical and overblown diatribe that bordered on melodramatic, Frank threatened the nation with an “unmitigated disaster” if the Communist plan was not accepted. He simultaneously continued to repeat the Communist talking point that the nation was in “the worst economic situation since the Great Depression”.

Financial experts denounced the divisive rhetoric and chided Frank for his irresponsible and fearmongering remarks.
“Clearly this initiative won’t help the economy at all,” one financial analyst shared privately. “Frank is attempting to do two things here; divert tax dollars to his Communist allies in the auto union sector and further the Cloward-Piven strategy of induced bankruptcy.

The Cloward-Piven strategy of Induced Bankruptcy, or IB, was the brainchild of Communists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Piven, first proposed in the late 1960’s. It theorized that capitalism could be destroyed by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pusing the society into crisis and economic collapse. In the mayhem of riots and unrest, the communists hoped to capitalize on the opportunity by introducing radical socialist reforms into the nation’s economic system.

Keen legislators on Capitol Hill vowed to quell the Communist ambitions, however. “We’re very aware of what they’re doing, and we’re not going to let it happen”, one congressman confided on condition of anonymity. “They brought down New York in 1975 and revealed their despicable actions for the world to see.”

The U.S. has been experiencing mild economic turbulence, with rising unemployment figures and low G.D.P growth. Critics charge that the communists have been attempting to exploit the opportunity to call for extreme socialist measures, such as income redistribution and industrial nationalization, central tenets of the socialist/communist doctrine.

“In many ways, this ‘crisis’ was caused by the Communists, and now they are trying to follow through by completely destroying the American economy,” a hedge fund manager said on Friday. “If it weren’t for their frontgroup’s(ACORN) extreme harassment of legislators, and the near-criminal legislation passed in ‘95(CRA), we wouldn’t be where we are today.”

American citizens have maintained calm throughout the bumpy economic ride. Although holiday retail sales were down slightly, there was still a fair amount of economic activity, with goods and service industries bustling. Companies with untenable positions, like the auto and several insurance sectors, have been desperately asking for federal loans to rescue what some experts have termed gross mismanagement and unsustainable business practices.

“The communists in the unions drove up the wages, and now the auto companies can’t compete anymore,” one insider warned. “They have to spend on average $2000 more just to remain competitive with companies like Honda, Toyota and Nissan. It’s just unreal.”

COMMUNIST SPECIAL FORCES KILL 119, TAKE AMERICAN AND BRITISH HOSTAGES

COMMUNISTS LAUNCH FIRST STRIKE SINCE OBAMA’S ELECTION

Mumbai, India – Russian Special Ops forces launched a terrorist strike in India, killing at least 119 and wounding over 288 civilians. The Soviet operation was a coordinated attack, occurring simultaneously at 7 different locations. A top police official said the forces were holding an unknown number of civilians hostage at two luxury hotels, the Taj Mahal and Oberoi hotels.

The soldiers also attacked police headquarters in South Mumbai, where most of the killings occurred. According to a media report, the Deccan Mujahideen claimed responsibility for the operation. The group sent emails to multiple media organizations, according to The Press Trust of India news agency.

The Deccan Mujahideen, a Russian terrorist group, is a front for the Communists in Moscow and receives their training, funding and organization from Putin.

The heavily armed military forces stormed the hotels and train station with automatic rifles and grenades, taking hostages and specifically looking for civilians who had British or American passports.

The State Department and the White House both strongly condemned the attack and deplored the tragic loss of innocent life caused by the attacks.

The sophisticated military-grade assault was the first since the election of Barack Obama, and triggered memories of the Iranian Hostage Crisis during Jimmy Carter’s administration.

The motive was an international test of Western resolve, as well an attack on a key U.S. ally.

“Russia is killing two birds with one stone,” one geopolitical expert confided. “They’re weakening India, a prime enemy, and testing Obama to see how he’ll react.”

The expert also concluded that it was a politically sensitive time in the U.S. due to the financial crisis and the transition of power and cautioned the West against reacting timidly to the aggression.

“Nothing short of full denunciation of Russia and possible military action is necessary here,” one insider warned, speaking confidentially on condition of anonymity, before adding “This must not be allowed to pass unpunished.”

There were no immediate reports of American or British casualties, and according to Indian authorities a total of 14 soldiers had been either killed or detained. Confession was unlikely, as they generally maintain strict discipline in regards to message, and would most likely offer little in the way of viable intelligence.

Analysts say this aggression only highlights the emerging criminal nature of the Communist government in Russia, and called on the international community to expel the Kremlin from major world organizations, including the UN, the G8, as well as instituting financial sanctions.

“Putin’s crimes against humanity must be remedied,” one human rights advocate proclaimed, calling for severe economic sanctions against the repressive regime. They also called for a military blockade of all Russian ships, submarines and military units.

The attack brought back memories of the July 2007 bombings. Those were also targeted at railway trains, and commuter train stations, and also contained seven bomb blasts. The July 2007 bombings ended in a tragic loss of life, killing 187 people.

AUDIOTAPE BOMBSHELL – KENYAN AMBASSADOR SAYS OBAMA BORN IN KENYA

ALSO:PHD GRAPHICS EXPERT UNEQUIVOCALLY DECLARES OBAMA COLB A FORGERY

Nairobi, Kenya – Barack Obama’s birthplace in Kenya is well-known and is fast becoming an attraction, the ambassador of Kenya said in a bombshell audiotape unearthed recently.

Peter Ogagi, the Kenyan ambassador, made the startling assertion in a telephone interview following the momentous election of Obama to the presidency. When asked if Obama’s birthplace in Kenya would be a national memorial, the ambassador responded, “Yes, it is already an attraction.”

Later on during the conversation, the ambassador expounded, saying Obama’s birthplace in Kenya was “well-known” among locals.

His statement confirmed what many Obama skeptics had been maintaining all along; Obama was in reality a foreign national and had no possession of American citizenship.

(Youtube) Kenyan Ambassador confirms Obama born in Kenya.

The Constitution maintains that all candidates for president must be 35 years of age or older, have lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years, and be a natural born citizen. According to the ambassador, Obama violated this last requirement and thus is not eligible to take the mantle of the U.S. presidency.

Constitutional scholars have been suspicious of Obama’s refusal to produce proof of birth for the courts. Although the Obama camp has a Certificate of Live Birth on his website, and a supporters website Factcheck.org, experts say a COLB’s are not barometers of citizenship and are issued to all newborns, regardless of country of birth.

“The refusal to produce his proof of birth is slightly disturbing,” one constitutional professor noted. “The American people are beginning to become suspicious of Obama’s reasons in light of this controversy.”

There have been numerous incidents casting doubt on the legitimacy of Obama’s eligibility for the presidency. The ‘citizenship controversy’ has grown slowly, with more and more witness progressively emerging to testify of disparities between Obama’s claims and the facts.

As was recently documented here, Obama’s grandmother in Kenya was heard on audiotape confirming his birth as being in Kenya.

Adding to the controversy was the statement of Ron Polarik, an expert in graphics with a Doctorate in Structural Media, who testified that the certificate provided by Obama was an unequivocal forgery.

(Youtube) Ron Polarik, PhD declares Obama certificate a fraud.

“The Certification of Live Birth(COLB) presented by the Obama campaign is without a doubt a forgery,” Polarik said in a Youtube video, his face and voice disguised due to a bevy of death threats launched since his emergence.

Although the Obama camp has been attempting to ignore the igniting firestorm, cracks have begun appearing in the rigid facade. An Obama supporter became contentious when asked during a press conference about the camp’s refusal to produce the authentic birth certificate.

“I don’t think I have anything to say on that, Lester,” Tony Fratto, the Obama supporter fumed, before cutting the reporter off with “We’re going to end it right there.”

These recent developments, combined with the possible deliberation by the Supreme Court, have produced consternation and fear in the Obama camp.

“He’s notably worried,” one insider confided on condition of anonymity. “It’s starting to look real bad for him. He thought he could make it to Inauguration Day, but even that is looking like a slim possibility.”

The shocking new developments dealt a fatal blow to Obama’s chances of becoming the 44th President of the United States. The emerging witnesses, his own family’s testimony, compounded by the testimony of experts in the field of informational structure, have left the Obama camp reeling and succeeded in perpetuating a perception of the candidate as not always forthcoming with the truth.

RUSSIA ESCALATES PROPAGANDA EFFORTS AGAINST AMERICA

PUTIN ATTEMPTS TO ASSASSINATE U.S. CHARACTER

Moscow, Russia – Vladimir Putin escalated the propaganda war against the United States Tuesday by launching a scalding salvo through a KGB-controlled ‘think tank’, claiming America’s prosperity was in decline and threatening to invade Alaska.

The international community condemned Putin for what amounted to a declaration of war, with some experts privately confiding the former Russian Prime Minister was becoming increasingly erratic.

“He’s becoming increasingly belligerent,” one expert warned. “If he keeps this up, he’s in for a rude awakening.”

Putin’s threat to invade Alaska was not taken lightly by U.S. defense forces, with high-ranking generals responding to the former Prime Minister’s hostile overtures.

“Let him come,” one general grimly remarked. “We’ll blow his planes out of the sky. We’ll pulverize his tanks. It would be suicide.”

The latest attack came fresh on the heels of the last salvo from Putin, who escalated the propaganda war at the U.S. by accusing them of participating in the defense of Georgia during the Russian invasion.

In the eyes of many observers, Putin’s spurious accusation was an attempt to distract from economic troubles at home and a continuation of the Communists’ narrative of the U.S. as aggressors.

International geopolitical analysts warned the move could backfire and result in widespread isolation and condemnation of Russia. Western nations roundly denounced what was widely viewed as an unprovoked invasion of Georgia by Russian strategic forces. Military analysts stated the attack, which involved multiple air sorties and large infantry movements, could only have happened with months of preparation.

Flush from the wealth of petrodollars and a natural gas agreement with Europe, Russia has been rapidly modernizing its strategic forces, making large strides forward in technological and ballistic capability. Many international experts have speculated as to the reason for Russia’s newfound aggressive posture, with many observers pointing to a future confrontation between the Soviet Union and the West.

“Russia has never changed,” said one geopolitical expert who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They have never deviated from their longtime goal of Communist world domination. The public figureheads might have been shuffled around, but the main objective has always remained the same.”

There are many who remain skeptical of Russia’s intentions and design regarding the West and future relations between the two. As prominent scholar and noted Soviet expert J.R. Nyquist documents, “The Russian policy is, first and last, to isolate the United States and weaken its position as the defender of Europe,” further noting “the destabilization of the foundations of the world order was Moscow’s objective. It was not the result of the war in Georgia, but the reason for initiating it.”

Yuri Bezmenov, the prominent Soviet defector, once famously remarked “Russia dedicates 85% of it’s time, money, and manpower to disinformation, propaganda and ideological subversion. The other 15% is espionage.”

Many Sovietologists remark on how the Communists have begun to increase the tone and frequency of their propaganda attacks. They note how a theme has begun to emerge from the Kremlin:America is an evil nation. They say Russia is attempting to paint the U.S. with the brush of imperialism, aggression, and disregard for human rights. According to them, this is interesting because these are the very issues the Soviet Union has itself been criticized for.

Russia has seen a marked increase in repression in freedom of thought and expression. Putin and the Communist Party have been clamping down, attempting to further consolidate their control over the media and other information sources. Recently, a journalist was discovered beaten so badly that he required amputation and is still in a coma.

Mikhail Beketov’s story is emblematic of the brutal crackdown occurring against journalists who dare to challenge the Communists’ systematic crimes. Human rights organizations have deplored and condemned the atrocities, violence and intimidation committed against Russian reporters, blasting Putin’s record on civil liberties.

Reporters without Borders voiced concern over the murders of reporters and demanded Russia prosecute those responsible for the crimes. They note that the Anna Politkovskaya murder still remains unsolved, even while there are connections to the highest levels of government. Human rights advocates say that while Putin remains in power, injustices like the assault against Beketov will continue.

“Putin should be tried for crimes against humanity,” one human rights advocate fumed. “He is a traitor to the Russian people and should rot in jail for his murders.”

WORLD HANGS IN BALANCE AS SUPREME COURT DEMANDS RESPONSE FROM OBAMA

CRITICS CALL ON OBAMA TO PRODUCE PROOF OF BIRTH

Washington, DC – The world held its breath as the Supreme Court demanded a response from the Obama campaign to the Writ of Certiorari filed by Philip Berg. The response was due on, or by December 1st, and sparked speculation of a Supreme Court showdown over Obama’s citizenship.

(Editorial Update:Justice Clarence Thomas has placed the case on the docket for conference for December 5th. If four of the nine justices agree to hear the case, oral arguments would commence.)

The case, Berg v. Obama, has threatened the entire house of cards Obama’s candidacy was built on and has insiders worried about the prospects of the inauguration actually happenning.

“It doesn’t look good,” one insider remarked on condition of anonymity. “There’s only one obstacle standing in Obama’s way though – the Constitution.”

Critics have long alleged that Obama is a foreign born national, has Communist and Islamic ties and is deeply unqualified to operate the highest office in the country. Those fears were lent some validation as it was revealed that Obama’s plan for correcting the economy was to suggest more government spending.

Lawsuits have sprung up across the nation in the wake of Obama’s emergence as a candidate initially, and then the winner of the 2008 presidential election. Many are challenging his status for the office, claiming he is ineligible on the basis of his foreign citizenship. Many have been baffled by the Obama camp’s reluctance to simply produce the documents and silence the criticism.

“It’s very suspicious,” a judicial insider commented. “He could make all these lawsuits go away by simply producing a piece of paper. The fact that he hasn’t suggests he doesn’t have it.”

Philip.J.Berg, a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, brought the complaint August 21st in federal district court and has continued to track the case’s movement through the judicial system. To many, he has galvanized a movement and become emblematic of speaking truth to power regardless of the political cost.

The Court’s Justices are allegedly quite interested in the Berg v. Obama case and have been studying the documents for quite some time. It has been reported that four, and possibly five, of the Justices plan on moving forward with the investigation.

The political blow would be quite costly for Obama if the Court does indeed explore further options in regards to the case. National media outlets, while reluctant to expand on their reportage of Berg v. Obama, have begun to focus more directly on the salient aspects of the conflict, with major media companies beginning to tap into the story.

American patriots across the nation held their breath as the world awaited the Obama response to the Writ of Certiorari. Opponents of communism underscored the deep importance of this moment in time.

“History hangs in the balance,” a freedom fighter declared at a constitutional support rally. “Will we allow this usurper to gain control of the American kingdom? Will we fight?”

Constitutional scholars have pointed to this time as a crucial moment in American democracy. If Obama is inaugurated, many fear he will roll back the clock on key gains in civil liberties, including the right to free speech and the right to bear arms. Gun sales have skyrocketed since his election, reflecting the near prescient fear many Americans have of this suspicious newcomer to the political scene.

Compounding the matter has been Obama’s ‘thuglike’ tactics regarding supression of free speech, as was evidenced when he directed his followers to jam a radio station’s phone lines during an opponent’s appearance. He has also called for legal action against those whom have disagreed with him in print and in television. Some say there is cause for worry.

“We all saw what he did during the primaries and the general election,” one radio host warned. “This man has no regard for freedom of speech or the right to bear arms. This man would destroy the Constitution.”

They were words that rang prophetic to some and alarmist to others. Many, however, could agree that the Constitution reigned supreme and expressed hope that justice and truth would prevail.

“Democracy won’t go down without a fight,” a constitutonal expert proclaimed. “The people won’t let it.”